Saturday, February 1, 2025

Green Quirk part 4: Internal Combustion Engine Efficiency--Permanent Solutions For a Healthy Environment


            

 

                                                                                                                                             Image: Krzysztof from Pixabay



Green Quirk part 4

Internal Combustion Engine Efficiency: permanent solutions for a healthy environment

There have been many inventors over the years who have worked to improve the gas/diesel efficiency of the internal combustion engine and reduce exhaust emissions. These same innovators, to their surprise, have found themselves in direct conflict with the very organizations they thought would support their ideas, the petroleum industry, original equipment manufacturers (OEM), and their federal government policing agencies (e.g. EPA, FTC).

Over the years, there have been small changes in the carburetor’s efficiency, but nothing substantial. A new car in North America today averages about 25.4 mpg (10.6 km/l). The 1908 Ford Model T got between 13-21 mpg, the 1930 Chevy truck about 15-20 mpg, and the 1956 Ford Edsel 13.7 mpg. The only innovation since then is the efficient catalytic converters on engines for emission control, but the fuel economy remains roughly the same. The oil companies have tight control over certain aspects of the automobile industry. Greed and consumer consumption drive profits, and internal combustion engine efficiency is not in their best interest.

In the 1970s-80s, Lt. Col. Charles L. Brown invented a technology to improve gas mileage by humidifying the air intake on an internal combustion engine while at the same time reducing exhaust emissions. He amazed his colleagues with the engine’s increased efficiency of 20-30%. He started selling his technology, attracting the attention of the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), not knowing of the consequences that followed. One project involving the EPA involved a diesel engine with improved fuel economy and a diesel emission reduction of 23%. In a project with the Maritime Administration using a modified engine on a pusher tug/tow boat, Brown added 20% more horsepower and lowered fuel consumption by 20% while at the same time reducing emissions by 40%. His carburetor not only humidified the air and provided oxygen to the engine, but it also generated combustion-stimulating molecules and radicals in the process, similar to what he called a “thunderstorm in a bottle”. Brown had created a new science that was substantiated by various research professionals. The carburetor could be retrofitted on any vehicle and was tested to work with propane, diesel, and gas engines. According to Brown, the big diesel polluters like buses, 16-wheelers, ships, boats, tractors, and power plants could benefit greatly from this technology. He even had a deal with an auto dealer who offered his carburetor for free with every American-made car, truck, or van purchased.

It appears the government had tricked Brown, milking him for his research and test results. After they saw the test results, all his test vehicles and equipment were stolen. The Maritime Administration took all his notes and records and declared its research division eliminated. He had a bomb threat in a hotel where he was staying. His own car, while parked at another hotel (Holiday Inn) along with test equipment and a prototype carburetor, was stolen in a lighted parking lot. There is no question that he was being followed and his phone was monitored.

Unfortunately, Brown’s carburetor never made it into the market, and the benefit to consumers was never realized. Lt. Col. Brown, a US WWII veteran, was left bankrupt and died at 86 in November 2008, with his carburetor, research, and test results taken out of the public domain.

The dream to create a high-efficiency carburetor was also the goal of two inventor mechanics, John Robert Fish and Charles Nelson Pogue. Both inventors created a stir in the oil and original parts manufacturing industry.

Charles Pogue was from Winnipeg, MB. He made headlines in 1933 when he drove a 1932 Ford V8 200 miles on a gallon of gas during a demonstration overseen by the Ford Motor Company in Winnipeg using his super-carburetor system. Later, in 1936, the Breen Motor Company of Winnipeg tested the Pogue carburetor on a Ford V-8 Coupe and got 200+ mpg. Winnipeg’s largest auto dealers supposedly tested the carburetor with the amazing results of 216.8 mpg. Newspapers claimed Pogue took his 1929 Chrysler Imperial from Winnipeg to Vancouver on 15 gallons of gas, averaging 130 mpg over a distance of 1879 miles. His carburetor was never independently verified but was of interest to the army.

According to a 1945 unnamed source, carburetors marked “POGUE CARBURETOR, DO NOT OPEN” were used by American Army tanks throughout WWII and removed from circulation after the war.

The carburetor’s optimal performance came from ‘white’ gas, gas without additives such as Tetraethyl lead. Additives in the fuel made Pogue’s elaborate carburetor inefficient, giving it similar gas mileage to the standard carburetors. Tetraethyl lead had been added to gasoline since 1922 as an antiknock agent, to increase octane rating, and improve engine performance; however, there was a theory, whether conspiracy or not, that lead was added to gasoline to stop Pogue and others from building similar devices. Lead leaves heavy deposits and clogs the device, rendering the carburetor inefficient because of its inability to transfer heat to preheat the fuel.

The Pogue or the Winnipeg carburetor worked by preheating the gas into a vapour before entering the engine's combustion chamber. Here is an excerpt from Rex Research offering a brief description of the Pogue carburetor:

Charles N. Pogue (April 9, 1935)

This invention relates to a device for obtaining intimate contact between a liquid in a truly vaporous state and a gas, and particularly to such a device which may serve as a carburetor for internal combustion engines, and is an improvement on the form of device shown in my Patent # 1,938,497, granted December 5, 1933.

In carburetors as commonly used for supplying a combustible mixture of air and liquid fuel to internal combustion engines a relatively large amount of the atomized liquid fuel is not vaporized and enters the engine cylinder more or less in the form of microscopic droplets. When such a charge is "fired" in the engine cylinder only that portion of the liquid fuel which has been converted into the vaporous and consequently the molecular state, combines with the air to give an explosive mixture. The remaining portion of the liquid fuel which is drawn into the engine cylinder and remains in the form of small droplets does not explode and thereby impart power to the engine, but burns with a flame and raises the temperature of the engine above that at which the engine operates most efficiently, i.e., from 160° to 180° F.

In my aforesaid patent there is shown and described a form of carburetor in which the liquid fuel is substatially completely vaporized prior to its introduction into the engine cylinders, and in which means are provided for maintaining a reserve supply of "dry" vapors available for introduction into the engine cylinder. Such a carburetor has been found superior to the standard type of carburetor referred to above and to give better engine performance with far less consumption of fuel.

It is an object of the present invention to provide a carburetor in which the liquid fuel is broken up and prepared in advance of and independent of the suction of the engine and in which a reserve supply of dry vapors will be maintained under pressure ready for introduction into the engine cylinder at all times. It is also an object of the invention to provide a carburetor in which the dry vapors are heated to a sufficient extent prior to being mixed with the main supply of air which carries them into the engine cylinder to cause them to expand so that they will be relatively lighter and will become more intimately mixed with the air prior to their explosion in the engine cylinders.

I have found that when the reserve supply of dry vapors is heated and expanded prior to being admixed with the atmospheric air a greater proportion of the potential energy of the fuel is obtained and the mixture of air and fuel vapors will explode in the engine cylinders without any apparent burning of the fuel which would result in unduly raising the operating temperature of the engine.

More particularly, the present invention comprises a carburetor in which liquid fuel vapors are passed from a main vaporizing chamber under at least a slight pressure into and through a heated chamber where they are caused to expand and in which droplets of liquid fuel are either vaporized or separated from the vapors, so that the fuel finally introduced into the engine cylinders is in true vapor phase. The chamber in which the liquid fuel vapors are heated and caused to expand preferably comprises a series of passages through which the vapors and the exhaust gases from the engine pass in tortuous paths and in such manner that the exhaust gases are brought into heat interchange relation with the vapors and give up a part of their heat to the vapors to cause their heating and expansion.” Diagrams, upgraded versions, and more details can be found at Charles Nelson Pogue: US Patent #1,759,354 ("Carburetor").

In 1936, Pogue’s Winnipeg carburetor caused oil stocks to crash, making him a worldwide legend and a media sensation. He upset the Toronto Stock Exchange, the major oil companies, and carburetor manufacturers. He was threatened several times, the workshop was broken into a few times, models were stolen, and he received pressure from both the US and Canadian governments. In the mid-late 1930s, according to some articles, Pogue, tired and frightened, surrendered by selling to the large oil companies his carburetors, plans, and research. Everything was placed into the trunk of a Pierce Arrow and taken away. He stayed in Winnipeg until after WWII, when he moved to Montreal, producing oil filters for heavy machinery. Pogue became very secretive and reclusive, refusing to talk to the media and reporters. Mystery surrounded his dealings, financial backers, and sales numbers. The legitimacy of the media reports is also questionable. He continued experimenting with carburetors under the “Winnipeg” name until 1952. The Winnipeg carburetor saw limited production. Pogue returned to Winnipeg in 1973 after his wife died and remained there in a secure retirement home until his death in February 1986 at 88.

John Robert Fish was an American inventor and mechanic with a much simpler carburetor design than Pogue’s more elaborate model. The simplicity of the model made it easier to manufacture and maintain. It had enhanced atomization capabilities, and some claim it delivered up to 200 mpg. Just with the Pogue carburetor, Fish’s design lacked independent verification. The general claim is that Fish’s model achieved 20% better gas mileage and 30% more horsepower and could be mounted on many different engines. An excerpt from an online publication, Ross Carburetors, gives an idea of how Fish’s design worked:

“The Fish Carburetor was originally invented by John Robert Fish in America in the early Thirties. The carb works on pressure differential – not air speed, which means that it is almost instantly self adjusting & self compensating so any change in weather or altitude requires no adjustments or modifications as with conventional carbs. Hence all round suitability for cars, boats, aircraft, mountain or pressure charging use.

Instead of the usual one main fuel discharge point within the carburetor, the “Fish” has from SIX to TEN leading to vastly superior atomization and therefore much improved vaporization and since wet fuel DOES NOT burn (only the vapor), better and more complete combustion is ensured enabling more power to be extracted from the same amount of fuel.”

The Fish Carburetor Company of Daytona Beach, between 1947 to 1959, manufactured over 125,000 high-mileage carburetors. During this time, the company had various financial and production problems. There were attempts to disrupt Fish’s business by big oil and original equipment manufacturers. Dirty tricks, including mail stoppages, were employed by the sinister forces to stop his cash flow and put him out of business, but Fish kept going, selling his carburetors to individuals and wealthy big game fishermen. During this time, he befriended the famous stock car legend, Fireball Roberts. Fireball drove the original M-1 car and a Fish carburetor in place of the big 4-barrel “Works” carburetor that everyone was using. Fireball, with his out-of-date car, left the other racers standing and frequently won the trophy. His race car tires repeatedly developed mysterious problems, which did not happen for racers using the “Works” original equipment carburetor. Fish also sold his product in Canada and Europe. After he passed away in 1958, the design was licensed to a firm that later folded, and from 1981-1996, a version of the Fish carburetor was manufactured by Brown Carburetor Company.

Another researcher, Dr. David Yurth, co-founder of the Nova Institute of Technology, Salt Lake City, UT, developed a corona discharge gas plasma disassociation system (CDGPDS) that broke down CO2 and eliminated vehicle exhaust fumes before they left the tailpipe. The device can be retrofitted to any internal combustion engine on the planet. It uses less than 20 amps of current with no modifications to the vehicle’s electrical system. The technology is lightweight, low-cost, energy efficient and can be adapted to gas vents used in refineries, incinerator exhaust stacks, and implemented in more than 100 uses.

According to Rex Research, the “CDGPDS™ incorporates proprietary plasma generating devices with high speed switching circuits to create what is known as a fracturing field inside a pulsating plasma chamber located within the exhaust system. The fracturing field breaks down or "dissociates" carbon dioxide and other pollutants within the device itself, thus eliminating the problem before it manifests. Dr. Michael Kralik, Senior Physicist and Chief Science Officer for Nova: states "Carbon dioxide molecules behave according to a well-known set of harmonic resonances which generate the fields that attract and bind the oxygen atoms to the central carbon atom. By subjecting the gas to intensely dissonant field effects, we are able to disrupt the spin polarity and oscillation frequencies that bind the atoms together."”

This is an amazing technology which suggests it can disrupt the spin polarity and oscillation frequencies of any atom and break any pollution molecule down to its basic elemental components.

A web search found active research into corona discharge disassociation of CO2, but nothing on the manufacturing and distribution of Yurth’s CDGPDS device. It may be in use commercially but not available to consumers.

A coworker in a retail outlet where I worked had an American uncle who produced a 150-200 mpg carburetor that also preheated the gas into vapour before entering the engine’s combustion chamber. Whether it was similar to Pogue’s device, and the time period involved, I have no idea. One day his uncle and the carburetor mysteriously disappeared and were never seen again. Sometime later, while still working at the same retailer, another coworker mentioned he knew of someone who just bought a new truck and was amazed at the superior gas mileage. Shortly thereafter, he got a call asking for his truck to be returned in exchange for a new one for the next three years. The exchanged truck had very poor gas mileage compared to his first vehicle. The discussion was interesting, it meant that there are handpicked people or organizations getting vehicles with higher mileage carburetors than the average consumer.

With the increased popularity of electric vehicles and the rise of fuel prices at the pump, fuel economy would be an excellent selling point in getting people to keep or buy gas vehicles; however, it appears the oil companies are willing to cut their own throats with their arrogance and stubbornness than to give the consumer any leeway on improved fuel mileage.

Green Quirk part 1 Introduction

Green Quirk part 2 Radiation Remediation and Thorium Reactors

Green Quirk part 3 Over Unity/Free Energy

Green Quirk part 4 Internal Combustion Engine Efficiency

Green Quirk part 5 Electrogravitic Space and Personal Vehicles

Green Quirk part 6 Water Electrolysis and Hydrogen

Green Quirk part 7 Conclusions


References:

  1. Automotive American; The Fish High Mileage Carburetor; September 1, 2024; The Fish High Mileage Carburetor – Automotive American; Site accessed 1-31-2025.

  2. Benjaminson, Jim; Charles Pogue’s 1929 Imperial: Car of the “200 mpg carburetor”; ALLPAR; November 16, 2020; Charles Pogue’s 1929 Imperial: Car of the “200 mpg carburetor” | Allpar Forums; Site accessed 1-30-2025.

  3. Bennett-Smith, Meredith; From Model T to Prius: 13 big moments in fuel efficiency history; The Christian science Monitor; March 7, 2012; From Model T to Prius: 13 big moments in fuel efficiency history – CSMonitor.com; Site accessed 1-29-2025.

  4. Bumbeck, Mike; 5 off-beat carburetors you”ve got to check out; Hagerty Media; September 11, 2019; 5 off-beat carburetors you’ve got to check out - Hagerty Media; Site accessed 1-30-2025.

  5. Charles Pogue Carb; the 200-mpg super carburetor; August 15, 2016; Fuel-efficiennt-vehicles.org; Charles Pogue Carb. – ** Fuel Efficient Vehicles **; Site accessed 1-30-2025.

  6. Charles Nelson Pogue; Vapor Carburetor; Rex Research; Charles Nelson Pogue: US Patent #1,759,354 ("Carburetor"); Site accessed 1-30-2025.

  7. Charles Nelson Pogue; Charles Pogue; Alchetron; September 22, 2024; Charles Nelson Pogue - Alchetron, The Free Social Encyclopedia; Site accessed 1-31-2025.

  8. Edelstein, Stephen; Why did the world use leaded gas—and why did it take so long to phase out? Green Car Reports; September 1, 2021; Why did the world use leaded gas—and why did it take so long to phase out?; Site accessed 1-30-2025.

  9. Expat; Anyone ever use a Fish Carburetor?; Bob’s The Oil Guy; March 17, 2014; Anyone ever use a Fish Carburetor? | BobIsTheOilGuy; Site accessed 1-31-2025.

  10. Fish, John R.; Carburetor; Rex Research; John R. Fish -- Carburetor -- Articles & US Patent; Site accessed 1-31-2025.

  11. Hasslberger, Sepp; Pogue Carburetor, ‘Gasoline Vapor Maker’ Increase Mileage; April 14, 2007; Pogue Carburetor, 'Gasoline Vapor Maker' Increase Mileage - Sepp Hasslberger; Site accessed 1-30-2025.

  12. Hottexhaust; The Role of Catalytic Converters in Modern Vehicles: How They Reduce Pollution and Improve Efficiency; Hottexhaust.com; October 15, 2024; The Role of Catalytic Converters in Modern Vehicles: How They Reduce Pollution and Improve Efficiency – Hottexhaust; Site accessed 1-29-2025.

  13. Markel, Andrew; Determining Catalytic Converter Efficiency; Underhood Service; August 28, 2024; Determining Catalytic Converter Efficiency; Site accessed 1-29-2025.

  14. Nova Institute of Technology; Breakthrough CO2 Technology Eliminates Vehicle Exhaust Fumes at the Source; PR Newswire September 25, 2015; Breakthrough CO2 Technology Eliminates Vehicle Exhaust Fumes at the Source; Site accessed 1-29-2025.

  15. Nic; Guide to Catalytic Converter Efficiency and Emission Control; Catalytic Converter Solutions; January 15, 2024;Guide to Catalytic Converter Efficiency and Emission Control; Site accessed 1-29-2025.

  16. Pixabay; Stunning royalty-free images & royalty-free stock; 5.2 million+ Stunning Free Images to Use Anywhere – Pixabay; Site accessed 1-19-2025.

  17. Rex Research; Inventor Index/Subject Index; Rex Research -- Inventor Index; Site accessed 1-30-2025.

  18. Ross Carburetors; Fish Carburetors; February 10, 2016; Fish Carburetors – Ross Carburetors; Site accessed 1-31-2025.

  19. Sirius Disclosure-YouTube; Project Grudge: The Tip of the Iceberg-Lt. Col. Charles Brown/Disclosure Proj. Testimony Archive (begin at 19:30 minutes); https://youtu.be/78qfynQdCf4?si=fBDicle0S6oTtQGI; Site accessed 1-29-2025.

  20. Yurth, David; Corona Discharge Gas Plasma Disassociation Sytem; rexresearch.com; David YURTH : Corona Discharge Gas Plasma Disassociation System; Site accessed 1-29-2025.

  21. Valentine, Tom; Charles Brown “Power Pak” Fuel Humidifier; rexresearch.com; April 1977; Charles Brown -- Power pak fuel hunidifier; Site accessed 1-29-2025.

  22. Wikipedia; Charlie Brown (pilot); Last edited January 4, 2025; Charlie Brown (pilot) – Wikipedia; Site accessed 1-29-2025.

  23. Wikipedia; Charles Nelson Pogue; Last edited October 14, 2024; Charles Nelson Pogue – Wikipedia; Site accessed 1-30-2025.

  24. Wikipedia; Tetraethyllead; Last edited January 15, 2025; Tetraethyllead – Wikipedia; Site accessed 1-30-2025.



Charles Pogue Carburetor Cutaway                                                                                                 Source:Hagerty Media




 John Fish Carburetor                               Source: just a car guy





Charles Kuss

2025

Updated: 05-21-2025

Thursday, January 30, 2025

Green Quirk Part 3: Over Unity/Free Energy--Permanent Solutions For a Healthy Environment

    Nikola Tesla sitting in his experimental station June 17, 1901, Colorado Springs, CO.               Source: Make: Magazine


   “If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” Nikola Tesla (~1893)

“Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the world’s machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels.” Nikola Tesla (1892)


Green Quirk part 3

Over Unity/Free Energy: permanent solutions for a healthy environment

True over-unity or free energy devices have been developed and proven to work for over 125 years. Some of these devices have produced enough electricity to permanently run a small business, factory, home or farm. There are hundreds of patents worldwide on these devices. The gadgets that work never make it out of the inventor’s research lab and into the public domain. The free energy patents and the unpatented devices that can be practically applied threaten the national security structure by replacing the current energy paradigm of fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewable energy. To protect this structure, working devices that have merit are confiscated, and the inventors are threatened or even murdered.

The free energy/over unity/zero-point energy/vacuum energy generators extract energy from fluctuations (resonating frequencies) in the quantum fields that give rise to residual energy in the ground state (stationary state of lowest energy-absolute zero) of a system. Resonant circuits are tuned to these fluctuations (frequencies) to harness this energy and convert it into usable electrical energy. This vacuum energy is all around us and throughout the universe.

There are numerous free-energy devices with a wide range of electrical outputs that potentially can be inserted into any electrical device. In this blog, I will only touch on three devices that have produced enough power to permanently run a home, electric vehicle (EV), small business, or farm. The devices are scalable if more electrical energy is required, and they can be locally installed, like an appliance, without using today’s cumbersome electrical infrastructure.

In the 1930s, Dr. Thomas Henry Moray of Salt Lake City, UT, a Tesla-inspired physicist, electrical engineer, and the father of modern electronics, developed what he called a Radiant Energy Device. Moray demonstrated his device on many occasions on land, underground, air, and in water, leaving engineers and scientists flabbergasted. It took Moray 20 years and $200,000 (1936 dollars) of his own money to research, develop, and tweak the device. In 1936, Moray had developed a 55 lb (30kg) box with an input of 0 kW to produce a constant output of 50 kW. The device was denied a patent because it mentioned the Moray Valve, a germanium transistor, a cold tube solid-state electronic component unknown to the patent office at the time. The patent examiner didn’t see how it worked since the cathode in a conventional hot tube had no means of being heated. The device used a simple antenna, solid-state electronic circuitry, and specially designed cathode ray tubes. An interesting side note, the transistor was developed by Bell Laboratories 20 years later, and an even more interesting side note is that solid-state electronics were developed by the NAZIs and German electronic firms in the 1930s but that’s another story. It makes me wonder how Bell Laboratories got wind of their transistor since the victors (Allies and Soviets) got the spoils of WWII.

US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt ordered the Rural Electrification Administration (REA) to work with Moray. A controversy grew between the REA and Moray, and Moray felt the government engineers were trying to sabotage his work. The details are unclear, but a REA engineer, Felix Frazer (a possible Soviet spy), took a sledgehammer and smashed Dr. Moray’s only working device to pieces. Moray believed to his dying day that it was a communist plot for refusing to cooperate with the Soviet Union. The device was never rebuilt because of the expense involved, inflation, and the suppliers providing specific parts had gone out of business. Moray was left bankrupt. On March 2, 1940, Dr. Moray was wounded in his lab in a gun battle, which his son, John, felt there was some kind of conspiracy at work. Dr. Moray’s fears and suspicions may have been well-founded since Republican Representative Thomas D. Winter wanted a full-scale investigation of the REA because of the Soviet spy's infiltration, who wanted complete disclosure of the materials and construction of the Radiant Energy Device. Dr. Moray severed his ties with the REA in February 1941. While working for the REA, Moray was paid $25.00/day. He died at 82 on May 18, 1974.

Floyd ‘Sparky’ Sweet was a college student when he earned his nickname Sparky at the General Electric (GE) plant where he worked. He had disconnected some wires, resulting in an instrument exploding in a spectacular spray of sparks. Despite the incident, he had an intuitive gift for solving electrical problems and his extraordinary achievements in the field of electromagnets prompted GE to further his education by awarding him a scholarship to MIT. In 1968, he earned his MSEE from MIT and specialized in applied magnetic and transformer design for GE. In the mid-1970s, he moved to Los Angeles, CA, where he continued with GE as a consultant and enjoyed semi-retirement. When he fully retired in the 1980s, he focused on his device, the Vacuum Triode Amplifier (VTA). Sweet had noticed that on rare occasions, a self-oscillation effect occurred in electric transformers and felt that these oscillations could be useful in producing energy. The VTA consists of an assembly of magnets and wire coils where a tiny input of energy in microwatts is used to initiate shaking and disturb a magnet’s force field into perpetual motion, creating an output of amplified vacuum energy in watts and megawatts. After some research, development, and tweaking, a viable device emerged, producing a stable power supply.

In 1987, Sweet’s final prototype was the most impressive and intriguing. The device was a solid-state gadget the size of a hand-held external hard drive. It was tested many times by his fellow researchers and continuously had an input of 0.3 milliwatts needed to jump-start the device and an output of 223,710 watts (223.71 kW), according to Dr. Steven Greer in his documentary “The Lost Century”. This stable output can easily run an EV, power a house, a small business, or a farm permanently without being tied to an electrical grid. After reading through the literature and watching videos, there seems to be some discrepancy as to the output of the device. That’s probably because there were several versions built, each with its own outputs, confusing the readers and viewers.

The device was not independently verified but repeatedly tested by his main colleague, Lt. Col. Tom Bearden, who was also a backer, along with others who have tested and verified the device's operational capabilities. Sweet felt the independent verification would ‘snuff’ him out immediately. He frustrated his fellow researchers by keeping secret the most important process of how he conditioned the magnets at the heart of the VTA. Sweet didn’t want his ‘secret sauce’ stolen by unscrupulous people who would build their own without giving him credit. He was also concerned, not only for his life, but mass rapid production of the device would upset the economy, causing world markets to collapse. Similar to Moray, the secrets that made the device work went to the grave along with the inventor. Researchers have tried to replicate the devices but failed to reproduce the original results.

As there was with Moray, there was a conspiracy afoot. Sparky was shot at, but the assassin missed. His apartment was broken into and his notes stolen. After leaving a supermarket one day, Sweet was accosted by a well-dressed gentleman who showed him a picture of him and his wife sitting in their dining room on the second floor of their apartment building. The gentleman walked Sweet to his apartment building and threatened him if he didn’t discontinue his research. After having been shown the photo, Sparky kept getting death threats from payphones across the country. He died mysteriously from a heart attack after having a cup of coffee at 83. Hours later, mysterious men claiming to be FBI in black vans confiscated all his equipment. Like with many of these inventors, there is some confusion surrounding his death, business affairs, and those who confiscated the equipment.

In 1931, Dr. Tesla [stand aside, Elon Musk Tesla] had converted a Pierce-Arrow into an electric vehicle. Here is an excerpt from: “The Forgotten Art of Electric Powered Automobiles” by Arthur Abrom posted on rexresearch.com’s website, Tesla Electric Car -- Miker Gamble retroengineering for Q.

“Tesla's Electric Car.....But, back to our electric automobiles -- in 1931, under the financing of Pierce-Arrow and George Westinghouse, a 1931 Pierce-Arrow was selected to be tested at the factory grounds in Buffalo, NY. The standard internal combustion engine was removed and an 80-hp 1800  rpm electric motor installed to the clutch and transmission. The AC motor measured 40 inches long and 30 inches in diameter and the power leads were left standing in the air -- no external power source!

At the appointed time, Nikola Tesla arrived from New York City and inspected the Pierce-Arrow automobile.  He then went to a local radio store and purchased a handful of tubes (12), wires and assorted resistors. A box measuring 24 inches long, 12 inches wide and 6 inches high was assembled housing the circuit. The box was placed on the front seat and had its wires connected to the air-cooled, brushless motor. Two rods 1/4" in diameter stuck out of the box about 3" in length.

Mr. Tesla got into the driver's seat, pushed the two rods in and stated, "We now have power". He put the car into gear and it moved forward! This vehicle, powered by an AC  motor, was driven to speeds of 90 mph. and performed better than any internal combustion engine of its day! One week was spent testing the vehicle.  Several newspapers in Buffalo reported this test. When asked where the power came from, Tesla replied, "From the ethers all around us". Several people suggested that Tesla was mad and somehow in league with sinister forces of the universe. He became incensed, removed his mysterious box from the vehicle and returned to his laboratory in New York City. His secret died with him!

It is speculated that Nikola Tesla was able to somehow harness the earth's magnetic field that encompasses our planet. And, he somehow was able to draw tremendous amounts of power by cutting these lines of force or causing them to be multiplied together. The exact nature of his device remains a mystery but it did actually function by powering the 80 hp AC motor in the Pierce Arrow at speeds up to 90 m.p.h. and no recharging was ever necessary!”

Another source from an unidentified document of the 1980s has more details of Tesla’s electric car, Tesla Electric Car -- Miker Gamble retroengineering for Q. This was an interview with Tesla’s nephew, Peter Savo. According to Peter, the clutch, brake, and manual gear shift were the same as with the gasoline version of the car. The speedometer was calibrated at 120 mph. The 12-volt Willard battery was mainly used for lights. There was also a six-foot antenna extending from the rear of the car. An ignition key started the car. Tesla mentioned that the receiver that powered the car had enough reserve power to light up a whole house. Peter mentioned Tesla was very secretive about the car and didn’t answer some of his questions. After eight days of testing in Buffalo, Tesla was pleased with the results. He removed the ignition key and radio tubes and left the car at a secluded farmhouse 20 miles from Buffalo. How the receiver worked remains a mystery.

Wikipedia, which has known deliberate disinformation and omissions, and connections to the US Central Intelligence Agency, considers Tesla’s electric car a hoax, although they doubt the entry as possibly not meeting their general notability guideline. It's not surprising if disinformation has been disseminated to discredit his free-energy electric car.

Tesla, near the end of his life, was treated very much like many of the gifted free energy innovators. The media often painted him as suffering from paranoia, but they never mentioned his real enemies with real agendas that were not in Tesla’s best interests.  Although Tesla had 300 patents worldwide, he did believe in technology sharing and believed that technological advancements should benefit humanity as a whole and not be restricted by patents and commercial interests. He died poor on January 7, 1943, at 86 in the Hotel New Yorker. People and corporations profited handsomely from his inventions and took credit for his innovations with little compensation to him.   

Free energy can easily be introduced to the public by starting with electric vehicles (EV). These devices would make every EV permanently electrically self-sufficient and provide reliable, hassle-free transportation. The EV can also serve as a power plant for camping, mobile homes, and job sites, and as a backup power supply during power outages for your home.

The free-energy technology can be portable or fixed, is scalable and is the most environmentally friendly, sustainable, and cost-effective means of producing electricity.  It should be seriously considered and not suppressed.

Green Quirk part 1 Introduction

Green Quirk part 2 Radiation Remediation and Thorium Reactors

Green Quirk part 3 Over Unity/Free Energy

Green Quirk part 4 Internal Combustion Engine Efficiency

Green Quirk part 5 Electrogravitic Space and Personal Vehicles

Green Quirk part 6 Water Electrolysis and Hydrogen

Green Quirk part 7 Conclusions

 

1931 Pierce Arrow sedan, similar to the one driven by Tesla.                                                    Source: Serious Wheels  


                                                                                      Source: AZ Quotes


  Wikipedia doubts the entry as possibly not meeting their general notability guideline.


Floyd Sweet’s free-energy device.                                                                          Source: The Lost Century documentary


        

                                                                 Source: unknown

                                                                                                          

References:

  1. AZ Quotes; Nikola Tesla Quotes; TOP 25 QUOTES BY NIKOLA TESLA (of 187) | A-Z Quotes; Site accessed 1-26-2025.

  2. Bearden, T.E. Lt. Col; T. Henry Moray; SVP Wiki; May 13, 2024; Sympathetic Vibratory Physics | T. Henry Moray; Site accessed 1-26-2025.

  3. Bottomless Bay; Nikola Tesla’s electric car; May 26, 2014; Nikola Tesla's electric car; Site accessed 1-26-2025.

  4. D. Miran; Nikola Tesla’s Wireless Electric Automobile-Explained; Linkedin.com; June 9, 2016; (12) Nikola Tesla's Wireless Electric Automobile- Explained | LinkedIn; Site accessed 1-28-2025.

  5. Elswick, Steven; Niola Tesla’s Electric Car-Folklore...Or Historical Fact?; April 2003; Nikola Tesla's Electric Car - Folklore... or Historical Fact? | Tesla Universe; Site accessed 1-28-2025.

  6. Greer, Steven Dr.; et al; YouTube-PopNet: The Lost Century; October 24, 2024; The Lost Century | Full Documentary; Site accessed 1-1-2025.

  7. Hogan, Timothy; Zohar Ancient History; Nikola Tesla is Not Who You Think | Secrets of the Knights Templar S1EP4; YouTube; October 9, 2024; https://youtu.be/7MMnm2l7gr4?si=RI_-t6fnxYWuNyJa; Site accessed 3-4-2025.

  8. Hutchison, John; Nikola Tesla; hutchisoneffect.ca; January 28, 2025; https://www.hutchisoneffect.com/Tesla%20Pierce-Arrow.php; Site accessed 1-28-2025.

  9. Kincaid, Paul W. Editor; Press Core; The 1931 Pierce-Arrow electric motor car that got its energy from thin air; December 13, 2013; The 1931 Pierce-Arrow electric motor car that got its energy from thin air. | PRESS Core; Site accessed 1-28-2025.

  10. Magnetic Power Generation; Exploring the Mechanics of Zero-Point Energy Generators; Green Life Zen; April 23, 2024; Exploring the Mechanics of Zero-Point Energy Generators; Site accessed 1-26-2025.

  11. Manning, Jeane; Vacuum Triode Amplifier-Floyd Sweet; NARKIVE Newsgroup Archive-sci.physics; 2010; Vacuum triode amplifier - Floyd Sweet or Vacuum triode amplifier - Floyd Sweet; Site accessed 1-26-2025.

  12. NuEnergy, staff; Radiant Energy: Not Generator, Atomic, Nor Solar; January 31, 2013; Radiant energy: not Generator, Atomic, nor Solar | NuEnergy; Site accessed 1-26-2025.

  13. Potential Energy; Overunity: Floyd Sweet’s VTA Unit; August 17,2021; Overunity: Floyd Sweet's VTA Unit | Potential Energy; Site accessed 1-28-2025.

  14. Sweet, Floyd A.; Space Quanta Magnifier (Vacuum Triode Amplifier); rexreseach.com; Floyd Sweet: Space Quanta Magnifier / Vacuum Triode Amplifier ~ Collected papers, diagrams, photos & videos; Site accessed 1-26-2025.

  15. Rex Research; Inventor Index/Subject Index; rexresearch.com; Rex Research -- Inventor Index and Rex Research Archives Home Page; Site accessed 1-26-2025.

  16. Tesla, Nikola; Electric Car; rexresearch.com; Tesla Electric Car -- Miker Gamble retroengineering for Q; Site accessed 1-26-2025.

  17. The Tom Bearden Website; The Moray Radiant Energy Device; The Tom Bearden Website; Site accessed 1-26-2025.

  18. Wikipedia; Ground state; September 3, 2024; Ground state – Wikipedia; Site accessed 1-26-2025.

  19. Wikipedia; List of Nikola Tesla Patents; June 9, 2024; List of Nikola Tesla patents – Wikipedia; Site accessed 1-28-2025.

  20. Wikipedia; Thomas D. Winter; December 7, 2024; Thomas D. Winter – Wikipedia; Site accessed 1-26-2025.





Charles Kuss

2025

Updated: 05-21-2025